Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vivian Baruch's avatar

Thank you Helen for your courage & honesty in answering questions about the personal impacts on you of the Grievance Studies Affair. I particularly enjoyed the last chapter of "The Counterweight Handbook" (quoted below) in which you outline the liberal principles needed to combat all forms of authoritarianism, in whichever form it manifests.

An article I submitted to a psychotherapy & counselling journal was recently rejected on a few ideological grounds, one of which was an insufficient focus on its applicability to indigenous clients and therapists. The main thesis of the article was how measuring outcomes & alliance in therapy by using two short, feasible, valid, empirical measures applied cross-culturally for nearly 25 years, levels the therapy playing field. They give clients a voice in their treatment, irrespective of race, gender, religion, socio-economic status & such variables, and empower clients to direct their therapy - except those in acute crisis (suicidal or severe psychosis), and some cognitive or developmental impairments. I'm concerned about the capture of our therapy field by DEI & share your concern that "Even though the movement is too divorced from reality, chaotic, contradictory, ethically inconsistent, and alienating to survive, it has done a great deal of damage socially and will likely do a lot more before it falls."

Expand full comment
Antonia Baur's avatar

I enjoyed this so much. So many great ideas for pushing back with respect.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts