Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rudolph Rigger's avatar

I did read the Free Press article and whilst some of it is worrying (and depressing) I also kind of wondered what version of 𝕏 the author was using, because it isn't really like mine.

Take, for example, the statement that "Since Trump’s win in November, the extreme right has completely taken over the platform . . ."

Eh?

They haven't (yet) taken over the bits of 𝕏 that constitute my feed at any rate.

That being said, wasn't this illiberal counter-woke reaction exactly what many people have, for years, been warning about? Didn't many of us (including myself) say that the end result of all of the racist claptrap that is DEI and CRT would be to make society *more* racist?

By putting the "cause of the day" on a pedestal, and rigidly clamping down on expressions of disquiet about that (for *years*), all they've done is to paint a big target on whatever "cause of the day" they claimed to want to support.

It is of course very wrong to go after those on the pedestal instead of those who *put* them on the pedestal, but it is at least partly understandable. We've had years and years of this illiberal crap masquerading as 'compassion' and many people are, understandably, extremely angry. Unfortunately, if this Free Press article represents some degree of truth, then this anger is currently being directed at the wrong target.

So we have a bunch of angry people simply lashing out, finally able to vent their frustration at the *years* of suppression (and going after the wrong targets) and this has been (allegedly) going on for, what, a few weeks? It's still wrong, I admit, but let's see how the oscillations settle down before claiming catastrophe, perhaps?

We also probably have a lot of genuinely nasty idiots who now feel more free to express their crappy views. We should let them - and argue against them.

What we need to be wary of is *any* attempt (right or left, woke or non-woke, or whatever) to restrict that necessary discussion.

There's also an aspect of this in which I would want a better view of what, exactly, is being described as "extreme right". Many of us still remember that those of us who shared MLK's dream were described as 'racist', for example. If that's being racist, then it's a badge I'll happily wear.

But, yes, we do have to keep a careful eye on this backlash. And the same principles we have stood by all along need to come to play - debate (however vigorous) is the way forward.

Expand full comment
DJ's avatar

The Never Trumpers were right all long. If Democrats are smart they’ll find a Bill Clinton type who emphasizes universal healthcare, “work hard and play by the rules,” making abortion “safe, legal and rare” and who isn’t afraid to fund 100k new cops.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts